Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Raytan/Dermoprotector
R
Raytan

Dermoprotector

crema50mlGTIN 7804916430189
Lipikar Baume AP+M

Cleaner pick · Safest crema we have rated

La Roche-Posay

Lipikar Baume AP+M

+66 on ingredient safety

200ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 4 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

54OUT OF 100Poor

range 44–73

30▲▼ split
Safety
86
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

88-point split

68

Scan

0

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

4 found

See better →

Flagged

8 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 88-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 4 cleaner options, safest first → Never ordered by affiliate payout.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

88 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

11 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·19 of 22 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 19 of 22 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (8)

  • BENZOPHENONE9/10fragrance materialuv absorber · fragranceraters disagree

    Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 6 of 9 lists →

  • ETHYLHEXYL METHOXYCINNAMATE7/10uv filter · uv absorber · light stabilizerraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • PROPYLPARABEN7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

  • BUTYLPARABEN7/10fragrance materialpreservative · fragranceraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

  • B.H.T7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

  • OCTOCRYLENE6/10uv filter · uv absorber · light stabilizerraters disagree

    Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • ACRYLATES COPOLYMER4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (11)

  • water
  • STEARIC ACID
  • CETEARYL ALCOHOL
  • GLYCERYL STEARATE
  • PEG-40 STEARATE
  • CETEARETH-20
  • MANGANESE DIOXIDE
  • DIMETHICONErich occlusive
  • C-12-15 ALKYL BENZOATE
  • C10-30 ALKYL ACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER
  • EDTA

No data in our sources (3)

  • PHENYLBENZIMIDAZOLE SULFONCI AUMINA
  • BUTYROSPERMI AUTER ACRYLATES
  • METHMPA ETHMLPARABEN

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • rich occlusiveDIMETHICONE

    • DIMETHICONE: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.