Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/familand/Monoi Coco Karité Sunscreen
Monoi Coco Karité Sunscreen
familand

Monoi Coco Karité Sunscreen

SunscreenGTIN 7804945064928
Centella Calming Daily Sunscreen

Cleaner pick · Safest sunscreen we have rated

Iunik Global

Centella Calming Daily Sunscreen

+54 on ingredient safety

$24

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 2406 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

46OUT OF 100Poor

range 36–73

46▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

75-point split

62

Scan

25

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2406 found

See better →

Flagged

4 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 75-point gap between the two loudest voices.

25Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 2406 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

75 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

    The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Fair·18 of 29 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 18 of 29 listed ingredients; 11 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (4)

    • 2-BROMO-2-NITROPROPANE-1,3-DIOL8/10preservativeraters disagree

      Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • PHENOXYETHANOL/METHYLPARABEN/PROPYLPARABEN6/10raters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • PARFUM6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CAMPHOR4/10fragrance · denaturant · plasticiserraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (14)

    • INGREDIENTES: AQUA
    • ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE
    • CETEARYL ALCOHOL
    • CETEARETH-20
    • CETYL PALMITATE
    • DIMETHICONErich occlusive
    • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
    • POTASSIUM CETYL PHOSPHATE
    • PROPYLENE GLYCOL DICAPRYLATE/DICAPRATE
    • HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
    • COCOS NUCIFERA OIL
    • BUTYL METHOXYDIBENZOYLMETHANE
    • OIL/ GARDENIA TAHITENSIS FLOWER EXTRACT
    • DISODIUM EDTA

    No data in our sources (11)

    • ETHYLHEXYL METHOXYONNAMATE
    • SODIUM ACRYLATES
    • COPOLYMER/ PARAFFINUM LIQUIDUWPPG-1 TRDECETH-6
    • C12-C15 ALKY BENZOATE
    • BUTYROSPERMUM
    • PARKIL
    • 4-METHYLBENZYUDENE
    • COCOS NUAFERA
    • BJH.T
    • 200 ml aprox
    • nor

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • undeclared fragrance blendPARFUM

      • PARFUM: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
    • rich occlusiveDIMETHICONE

      • DIMETHICONE: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.