Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Unknown/Pure Clean Scent Men 0%
Pure Clean Scent Men 0%
Unknown

Pure Clean Scent Men 0%

Roll-On Deodorant50mlGTIN 80917373
Trio Pro Cool

Cleaner pick · Safest roll-on deodorant we have rated

Misr Pyramids Group

Trio Pro Cool

+71 on ingredient safety, gives up 20 on packaging

50ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 107 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

38OUT OF 100Horrible

range 23–73

29▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

58-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

107 found

See better →

Flagged

22 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 100-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 107 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

100 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 11, 2026. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

    The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·40 of 43 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 40 of 43 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (22)

    • Citral7/10fragrance materialperfuming · flavouringraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Limonene7/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Parfum6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Citronellol6/10fragrance materialperfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Coumarin6/10fragrance materialperfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Eugenol6/10fragrance materialperfuming · denaturant · tonicraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Geraniol6/10fragrance materialperfuming · tonicraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Geranyl Acetate6/10fragrance materialperfuming · tonicraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Linalool6/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Linalyl Acetate6/10fragrance materialfragranceraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Ethyl Alcohol6/10commonly dryingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Pelargonium Graveolens Flower Oil4/10fragrance materialfragranceraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Pogostemon Cablin Oil4/10perfumingraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Acetyl Cedrene4/10fragrance materialperfumingraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Beta-Caryophyllene4/10perfuming · fragrance · skin conditioningraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Camphor4/10fragrance · denaturant · plasticiserraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Eugenyl Acetate4/10fragrance materialfragranceraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Hexamethylindanopyran4/10fragrance materialperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Isoeugenyl Acetate4/10fragrance materialperfumingraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Pinene4/10fragrance materialfragrance · antifoamingraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Terpineol4/10fragrance materialperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Tetramethyl Acetyloctahydronaphthalenes4/10perfuming · fragrance · skin conditioningraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (18)

    • Zinc Chloride Hydroxide
    • Glycerinhumectant
    • Triethyl Citrate
    • Polyglyceryl-6 Stearate
    • Pentylene Glycol
    • Ethylhexylglycerin
    • Polyglyceryl-6 Behenate
    • 2-Methyl 5-Cyclohexylpentanol
    • Xanthan Gum
    • C18-22 Hydroxyalkyl Hydroxypropyl Guar
    • Tocopheryl Acetate
    • Tapioca Starch
    • o-Cymen-5-ol
    • Sphingomonas Ferment Extract
    • Cellulose
    • Oryza Sativa Starch
    • Zea Mays Starch
    • Citrus Aurantium Peel Oil

    No data in our sources (3)

    • INGREDIENTE
    • ACH-Aluminum Hydrochloride
    • Alcool ** 100% post-consumer

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (4)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • commonly dryingEthyl Alcohol

      • Ethyl Alcohol: A fast-evaporating solvent that leaves a dry finish. International Chemical Safety Card ICSC 0044, Ethanol (anhydrous), prepared by an international group of experts for the ILO and WHO: "The substance defats the skin, which may cause dryness or cracking." Bommannan et al., as reported by Lachenmeier DW, "Safety evaluation of topical applications of ethanol on the skin and inside the oral cavity", J Occup Med Toxicol 2008;3:26, DOI 10.1186/1745-6673-3-26, open access, reference 82: "Bommannan et al. found in vivo in humans that ethanol enters the skin and removes measurable quantities of the lipid barrier material from the stratum corneum." Both describe stronger exposures than a cosmetic formula.
    • fragrance materialCitral, Citronellol, Coumarin, Eugenol, Geraniol, Limonene, Linalool

      • Citral: A lemon-scented fragrance component named separately on the label; the one name covers three related substances. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 70: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. As replaced by Commission Regulation (EU) 2026/909 of 27 April 2026, the entry is a GROUPED one covering citral, geranial and neral, declared collectively as "Citral", with per-product-type caps from 0,032% in deodorant to 1,2% in rinse-off and leave-on hair products. Its three substances carry two different sell-through dates: products not complying may not be placed on the Union market from 1 January 2027 in every case, and may not be made available from 1 July 2028 for citral, footnote (**), or from 1 August 2028 for geranial and neral, footnote (***). In the consolidated text those two footnotes are renumbered (46) and (47); both are worded "these substances", where the footnotes that attach to a single named substance say "that substance".
      • Citronellol: A rose-and-citrus fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 86: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
      • Coumarin: A sweet hay-scented fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 77: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
      • Eugenol: A clove-scented fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 71: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
      • Geraniol: A rose-scented fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 78: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
      • Limonene: A citrus-smelling fragrance component named separately on the label; the one name covers three related isomers. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 88: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. That entry carries transition footnote (37): stock that does not comply, lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off, may still be made available until 31 July 2028. It is marked on the racemic dl-limonene/Dipentene line and the (S)-(l-limonene) line, but NOT the (R)-p-mentha-1,8-diene (d-limonene) line, CAS 5989-27-5, whose duty was already running as entry 88 before Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545 and so needed no transition. All three isomers are declared under the single glossary name "Limonene", so that name on a label does not identify which of them is present.
      • Linalool: A floral fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 84: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
    • undeclared fragrance blendParfum

      • Parfum: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
    • humectantGlycerin

      • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

    Where this came from

    Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against haar-shop.ch ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.