Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/nivea Men/Shaving Foam
Shaving Foam
nivea Men

Shaving Foam

shaving foam200mlGTIN 8412300817028

Your composite

46OUT OF 100Poor

range 39–68

21▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
88
Pkg

Why this score

55-point split

0

Scan

55

Precautionary

0

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

9 found

See better →

Flagged

9 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 9 cleaner alternatives

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 85 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    0
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    55
  • IARC MonographsGovernmentunverified match
    82
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Governmentunverified match
    30
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    0
  • Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernmentunverified match
    85
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    45

Lowest 0 · highest 85 · gap 85

Also screened — no listing found

  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • California Proposition 65

Recognized on a safer-ingredients list

  • US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) — 65% of ingredients recognized

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
      30

    Packaging

    • Greenlens Packaging ScanIndependentunverified match
      88

    Coverage & match quality

    9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan0 on 0–100→0
    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen55 on 0–100→55
    • IARC Monographs82 on 0–100→82
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)30 on 0–100→30
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen0 on 0–100→0
    • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist85 on 0–100→85
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors45 on 0–100→45
    Average of 0 · 55 · 82 · 30 · 0 · 85 · 45pillar21

    Raters split here, so this 21 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    0/100

    Flagged 7 of 26 ingredients: 2 prohibited, 3 restricted, 2 of concern.

    • Isobutane, if it contains = >0,1% w/w ButadieneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex II (prohibited)−55
    • Trialkylamines, trialkanolamines and their saltsEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • LAURETH-9EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • Butane, if it contains = >0,1 % w/w ButadieneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex II (prohibited)−55
    • BHT / BHACommon transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12

    Starts at 100; 19 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 55 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Flagged ingredients

    • Isobutane, if it contains = >0,1% w/w Butadiene4 positions →
    • Trialkylamines, trialkanolamines and their salts4 positions →
    • LAURETH-93 positions →
    • Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice Powder4 positions →
    • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDE3 positions →
    • Butane, if it contains = >0,1 % w/w Butadiene4 positions →
    • BHT (Butylated Hydroxytoluene)4 positions →
    • Citric Acid4 positions →
    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)3 positions →

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·26 of 26 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 26 listed ingredients.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    Aqua→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Isobutane→propellantpropellant9/10EU-prohibited· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Triethanolamine→fragrancebufferingsurfactant - cleansingfragrancebufferingsurfactant - cleansing8/10ANSES CMR-listed· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Laureth-23→cleansingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingcleansingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeWell-characterized
    Palmitic Acid→emollientsurfactant - emulsifyingemollientsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Stearic Acid→fragrancecleansingemulsion stabilisingfragrancecleansingemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Panthenol→antistatichair conditioningskin conditioningantistatichair conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice Powder→skin conditioningskin conditioning4/10IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Propylene Glycol→humectantskin conditioningsolventhumectantskin conditioningsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Pantolactone→humectantskin conditioninghumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Sorbitol→perfumingfragrancehumectantperfumingfragrancehumectantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Coco-Caprylate/Caprate→emollientskin conditioningemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose→film formingantistaticbindingfilm formingantistaticbindingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    PEG-7M→bindingemulsion stabilisingviscosity controllingbindingemulsion stabilisingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Myristic Acid→perfumingcleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingperfumingcleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Arachidic Acid→cleansingopacifyingsurfactant - cleansingcleansingopacifyingsurfactant - cleansingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Oleic Acid→emollientsurfactant - emulsifyingemollientsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Potassium Hydroxide→bufferingbuffering4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Butane→propellantpropellant9/10EU-prohibited· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Propane→propellantpropellantNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Silica→abrasiveabsorbentanticakingabrasiveabsorbentanticakingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    BHT→fragranceantioxidantfragranceantioxidant7/10Endocrine-active· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Piroctone Olamine→preservativeanti-seborrheicpreservativeanti-seborrheicNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Citric Acid→fragrancechelatingbufferingfragrancechelatingbuffering4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Parfum→perfumingfragranceperfumingfragrance4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced