Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Les Cosmetiques/Spray solar invisible spf30 sun ultimate
Spray solar invisible spf30 sun ultimate
Les Cosmetiques

Spray solar invisible spf30 sun ultimate

sprays solares spf 25 a 45200mlGTIN 8431876272208
Centella Calming Daily Sunscreen

Cleaner pick · Safest sunscreen we have rated

Iunik Global

Centella Calming Daily Sunscreen

+62 on ingredient safety, gives up 18 on packaging

$24

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 2571 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

51OUT OF 100Poor

range 46–73

38▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
64
Pkg

Why this score

54-point split

58

Scan

28

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2571 found

See better →

Flagged

7 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 54-point gap between the two loudest voices.

28Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
82Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 2571 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

54 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 2 identified

    None of the 2 packaging components is identified beyond its broad material, so the packaging score is a stand-in — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

    The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·17 of 19 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 17 of 19 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (7)

    • Isobutane8/10propellantraters disagree

      EU harmonised CMR (cat. 1) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Butane8/10propellantraters disagree

      EU harmonised CMR (cat. 1) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Homosalate7/10uv filter · uv absorber · fragranceraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Benzophenone-37/10uv filter · uv absorber · light stabilizerraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

    • Alcohol Denat6/10commonly dryingfragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Octocrylene6/10uv filter · uv absorber · light stabilizerraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Parfum6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (10)

    • Ethylhexyl Salicylate
    • Propane
    • Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane
    • Diethylhexyl 2‚6-Naphthalate
    • water
    • Tocopheryl Acetate
    • Diethylhexyl Syringylidenemalonate
    • Carnosine
    • Caprylic
    • Capric Triglyceride

    No data in our sources (2)

    • Acrylates
    • Octylacrylamide Copolymer

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • commonly dryingAlcohol Denat

      • Alcohol Denat: Denatured ethanol: a fast-evaporating solvent that thins a formula and leaves a dry finish. International Chemical Safety Card ICSC 0044, Ethanol (anhydrous), prepared by an international group of experts for the ILO and WHO: "The substance defats the skin, which may cause dryness or cracking." WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care (2009) records depletion of the skin lipid barrier by lipid-dissolving alcohols, and also that "the lipid-dissolving effect of alcohols is inversely related to their concentration". Both describe stronger exposures than a cosmetic formula.
    • undeclared fragrance blendParfum

      • Parfum: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.