Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Les Cosmetiques/Booster radiante nº3
LC
Les Cosmetiques

Booster radiante nº3

otroGTIN 8431876282122

Your composite

65OUT OF 100Fair

range 53–94

40▲▼ split
Safety
90
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

83-point split

15

Scan

98

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1 found

See better →

Flagged

8 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 83-point gap between the two loudest voices.

15Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 1 cleaner alternative

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 83 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    15
  • Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernmentunverified match
    85
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    98
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    80
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Governmentunverified match
    90
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    25

Lowest 15 · highest 98 · gap 83

Also screened — no listing found

  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • IARC Monographs
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • California Proposition 65

Environmental

  • EU Microplastics RestrictionGovernmentunverified match
    90

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan15 on 0–100→15
  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist85 on 0–100→85
  • Greenlens Precautionary Screen98 on 0–100→98
  • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors80 on 0–100→80
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)90 on 0–100→90
  • Greenlens Tolerance Screen25 on 0–100→25
Average of 15 · 85 · 98 · 80 · 90 · 25pillar40

Raters split here, so this 40 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

15/100

Flagged 6 of 32 ingredients: 1 prohibited, 1 restricted, 1 of concern, 2 regulated allergens. Score capped: a prohibited (banned) substance is present.

Penalties alone would give 17, but a prohibited substance is present, so the score is capped at 15 — a genuine hazard isn’t diluted away by a long ingredient list.

  • Trialkylamines, trialkanolamines and their saltsEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
  • (2 -Isopropylpent-4-enoyl)urea (apronalide)EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex II (prohibited)−55
  • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
  • Hexyl CinnamalEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • LinaloolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3

Starts at 100; 27 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 83 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Flagged ingredients

  • Lactic Acid4 positions →
  • Trialkylamines, trialkanolamines and their salts3 positions →
  • (2 -Isopropylpent-4-enoyl)urea (apronalide)3 positions →
  • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)3 positions →
  • Carbomer4 positions →
  • Phenoxyethanol3 positions →
  • Hexyl Cinnamal4 positions →
  • Linalool4 positions →

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·32 of 32 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 32 listed ingredients.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
Aqua→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Pentylene Glycol→skin conditioningsolventskin conditioningsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Propanediol→solventviscosity controllingsolventviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Erythrulose→tanningtanningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Niacinamide→smoothingsmoothingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Biosaccharide Gum-1→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Butylene Glycol→fragrancehumectantskin conditioningfragrancehumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Panthenol→antistatichair conditioningskin conditioningantistatichair conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
PPG-26-Buteth-26→hair conditioningskin conditioninghair conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer→film formingemulsion stabilisingviscosity controllingfilm formingemulsion stabilisingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Aminomethyl Propanol→bufferingbufferingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
PEG-40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil→surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Sodium Lactate→humectantbufferingkeratolytichumectantbufferingkeratolyticNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Lactic Acid→humectantbufferingskin conditioninghumectantbufferingskin conditioning4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
TEA-Lactate→humectantskin conditioninghumectantskin conditioning4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Serine→fragranceantistatichair conditioningfragranceantistatichair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Urea→humectantantistaticbufferinghumectantantistaticbuffering8/10EU-prohibited· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeWell-characterized
Sorbitol→perfumingfragrancehumectantperfumingfragrancehumectantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Disodium EDTA→chelatingviscosity controllingchelatingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Parfum→perfumingfragranceperfumingfragrance4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Allantoin→soothingskin conditioningskin protectingsoothingskin conditioningskin protectingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Carbomer→emulsion stabilisinggel formingviscosity controllingemulsion stabilisinggel formingviscosity controlling4/10EU microplastics-restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Sodium Chloride→fragranceoral carebulkingfragranceoral carebulkingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Sodium Hyaluronate→humectantskin conditioninghumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Polysorbate 20→surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Phenoxyethanol→preservativeantimicrobialpreservativeantimicrobial4/10Mild sensitizer for some· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Sodium Benzoate→preservativefragranceanticorrosivepreservativefragranceanticorrosiveNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Hexyl Cinnamal→perfumingperfuming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Linalool→perfumingdeodorantperfumingdeodorant6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Palmitoyl Tripeptide-1→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued