Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Sanko/Traditional Hand Soap No. 1
S
Sanko

Traditional Hand Soap No. 1

jabon de manosGTIN 8436032038582

Your composite

44OUT OF 100Poor

range 35–70

42▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

70-point split

69

Scan

24

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1 found

See better →

Flagged

10 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 70-point gap between the two loudest voices.

24Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 1 cleaner alternative

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 70 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    69
  • Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernmentunverified match
    55
  • IARC MonographsGovernmentunverified match
    82
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    24
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    60
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Governmentunverified match
    35
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    94
  • California Proposition 65Governmentunverified match
    65

Lowest 24 · highest 94 · gap 70

Also screened — no listing found

  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Greenlens Packaging ScanIndependentunverified match
      46

    Coverage & match quality

    9 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan69 on 0–100→69
    • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist55 on 0–100→55
    • IARC Monographs82 on 0–100→82
    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen24 on 0–100→24
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors60 on 0–100→60
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)35 on 0–100→35
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen94 on 0–100→94
    • California Proposition 6565 on 0–100→65
    Average of 69 · 55 · 82 · 24 · 60 · 35 · 94 · 65pillar42

    Raters split here, so this 42 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    69/100

    Flagged 5 of 24 ingredients: 1 restricted, 1 of concern, 3 regulated allergens.

    • Fatty acid dialkylamides and dialkanolamidesEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
    • LinaloolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • CoumarinEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • LimoneneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3

    Starts at 100; 17 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 70 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Flagged ingredients

    • Cocamide DEA5 positions →
    • Cocamidopropyl Betaine3 positions →
    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)3 positions →
    • Citric acid4 positions →
    • Methylchloroisothiazolinone4 positions →
    • Methylisothiazolinone5 positions →
    • Acetic acid4 positions →
    • Linalool4 positions →
    • Coumarin4 positions →
    • Limonene5 positions →

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·17 of 22 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 17 of 22 listed ingredients; 5 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    Testé sous contrôle dermatologique→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    INGREDIENTS→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Sodium Laureth Sulfate→cleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansingcleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Sodium Chloride→fragranceoral carebulkingfragranceoral carebulkingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Cocamide DEA→emulsion stabilisingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingemulsion stabilisingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying9/10Carcinogen-linked· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Cocamidopropyl Betaine→antistaticcleansinghair conditioningantistaticcleansinghair conditioning6/10Strong contact sensitizer· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Parfum→perfumingfragranceperfumingfragrance4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Citric acid→fragrancechelatingbufferingfragrancechelatingbuffering4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Tetrasodium EDTA→chelatingchelatingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Magnesium Nitrate→hair conditioninghair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Magnesium Chloride→viscosity controllingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Methylchloroisothiazolinone→preservativepreservative6/10Strong contact sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Methylisothiazolinone→preservativepreservative7/10Strong contact sensitizer· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    C.I→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    16035→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Acetic acid→fragrancebufferingfragrancebuffering8/10EU harmonised CMR (cat. 1)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeWell-characterized
    42090→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Sodium Sulfate→bulkingviscosity controllingbulkingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Linalool→perfumingdeodorantperfumingdeodorant6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Coumarin→perfumingperfuming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Limonene→perfumingdeodorantsolventperfumingdeodorantsolvent7/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced