Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Tula/sun protection measures
sun protection measures
Tula

sun protection measures

SkincareGTIN 8500033101139
Centella Calming Daily Sunscreen

Cleaner pick · Safest sunscreen we have rated

Iunik Global

Centella Calming Daily Sunscreen

+32 on ingredient safety, gives up 12 on environmental impact

$24

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1283 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

65OUT OF 100Fair

range 62–71

68▲▼ split
Safety
90
Eco
55
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

39-point split

90

Scan

55

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1283 found

See better →

Flagged

5 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 39-point gap between the two loudest voices.

55Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 1283 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

39 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · IARC Monographs

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Tula as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 11, 2026. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 4 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

How we know the packaging

Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·38 of 40 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 38 of 40 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (5)

  • Homosalate7/10uv filter · uv absorber · fragranceraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Lactic Acid4/10exfoliating acidhumectant · buffering · skin conditioningraters disagree

    Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Hydrolyzed Wheat Protein4/10antistatic · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Carbomer4/10emulsion stabilising · gel forming · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (33)

  • Butyloctyl Salicylate
  • Pentylene Glycol
  • Lactococcus Ferment Lysate
  • 1‚2-Hexanediol
  • Silica
  • Ectoin
  • Glycerinhumectant
  • Arginine
  • Hydroxyectoin
  • Ananas Sativus Fruit Extract
  • Carica Papaya Fruit Extract
  • Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
  • Hedychium Coronarium Root Extract
  • Triethyl Citrate
  • Citrus Aurantium Dulcis Peel Extract
  • Citrus Limon Peel Extract
  • Pyrus Communis Fruit Extract
  • Pyrus Malus Fruit Extract
  • Rubus Idaeus Fruit Extract
  • Vanilla Planifolia Fruit Extract
  • Pimpinella Anisum Fruit Extract
  • Mica
  • Tocopherol
  • Ammonium Acryloyldimethyltaurate
  • Synthetic Fluorphlogopite
  • Dibutyl Lauroyl Glutamide
  • Dibutyl Ethylhexanoyl Glutamide
  • Propanediol
  • Trisodium Ethylenediamine Disuccinate
  • Sodium Chloride
  • Sodium Benzoate
  • Ethylhexylglycerin
  • Tin Oxide

No data in our sources (2)

  • VP Copolymer
  • PVP Crosspolymer

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (2)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • exfoliating acidLactic Acid

    • Lactic Acid: An alpha hydroxy acid that loosens surface skin cells; it also makes skin more sun-sensitive while you use it. FDA, "Guidance for Industry: Labeling for Topically Applied Cosmetic Products Containing Alpha Hydroxy Acids as Ingredients" (announced at 70 FR 1721, 10 January 2005; FDA web pages title it "Labeling for Cosmetics Containing Alpha Hydroxy Acids"), which names this acid and recommends the statement "Sunburn Alert: This product contains an alpha hydroxy acid (AHA) that may increase your skin's sensitivity to the sun and particularly the possibility of sunburn."
  • humectantGlycerin

    • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.