Cire Aseptine
aloe vera
uncategorizedGTIN 8682276601680
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 40-point gap between the two loudest voices.
58Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientEvery rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
Split · 40 pts apart- 82
- 58
- 82
- 98
- 65
Lowest 58 · highest 98 · gap 40
Also screened — no listing found
- California Proposition 65
- US NTP Report on Carcinogens
- ECHA SVHC Candidate List
- EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
- Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Recognized on a safer-ingredients list
Environmental
- 90
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
no black box
How this score is built
no black box
How this score is built
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
- 1
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
- 2
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
- 3
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
- 4
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
- Greenlens Tolerance Screen82 on 0–10082
- Greenlens Ingredient Scan58 on 0–10058
- IARC Monographs82 on 0–10082
- Greenlens Precautionary Screen98 on 0–10098
- ANSES Endocrine Disruptors65 on 0–10065
Average of 82 · 58 · 82 · 98 · 65pillar68
Raters split here, so this 68 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Why the safety score
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
58/100
Flagged 5 of 12 ingredients: 3 restricted, 1 of concern.
- Trialkylamines, trialkanolamines and their saltsEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
- Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
- CI 19140 / ACID YELLOW 23EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
- ACID BLUE 9EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
Starts at 100; 8 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 40 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Flagged ingredients
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust11 of 12 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 11 of 12 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| aquasolvent | solvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| aloe barbadensis | Not in our sources | No data | |
| glycerinperfuminghumectantdenaturant | perfuminghumectantdenaturant | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| phenoxyethanolpreservativeantimicrobial | preservativeantimicrobial | Mild sensitizer for some· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| carbomeremulsion stabilisinggel formingviscosity controlling | emulsion stabilisinggel formingviscosity controlling | EU microplastics-restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| triethanolaminefragrancebufferingsurfactant - cleansing | fragrancebufferingsurfactant - cleansing | ANSES CMR-listed· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| allantoinsoothingskin conditioningskin protecting | soothingskin conditioningskin protecting | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| parfumperfumingfragrance | perfumingfragrance | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| disodium edtachelatingviscosity controlling | chelatingviscosity controlling | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| aloe barbadensis leaf extracthumectantemollientoral care | humectantemollientoral care | IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| ci 19140coloranthair dyeing | coloranthair dyeing | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| ci 42090coloranthair dyeing | coloranthair dyeing | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |