Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Head&shoulders/Anti-roos shampoo + conditioner Menthol Fresh
Anti-roos shampoo + conditioner Menthol Fresh
Head&shoulders

Anti-roos shampoo + conditioner Menthol Fresh

Anti-Dandruff Shampoo300mlGTIN 8700216207966
Shampoo/Body Wash, Ginger-Orange (2019 formulation)

Cleaner pick · Safest multi-function cleansing we have rated

Healing-Scents

Shampoo/Body Wash, Ginger-Orange (2019 formulation)

+53 on ingredient safety

$12–30

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 618 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

41OUT OF 100Poor

range 37–52

47▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

40-point split

36

Scan

42

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

618 found

See better →

Flagged

12 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 44-point gap between the two loudest voices.

36Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
80EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 618 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

44 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

    A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·31 of 32 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 31 of 32 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (12)

    • Cocamidopropyl Betaine6/10antistatic · cleansing · hair conditioningraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Parfum6/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Hexyl Cinnamal6/10perfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Linalool6/10perfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Linalyl Acetate6/10fragranceraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Benzyl Alcohol6/10preservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Menthol4/10fragrance · denaturant · refreshingraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • TEA-Dodecylbenzenesulfonate4/10cleansing · foaming · surfactant - cleansingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Sodium Hydroxide4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Hexamethylindanopyran4/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • CI 420904/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 172004/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (19)

    • Aqua
    • Sodium Laureth Sulfate
    • Sodium Xylenesulfonate
    • Sodium Citrate
    • Dimethiconol
    • Cocamide MEA
    • Glycol Distearate
    • Piroctone Olamine
    • Sodium Chloride
    • Dimethicone
    • Guar Hydroxypropyltrimonium Chloride
    • Sodium Benzoate
    • Sodium Salicylate
    • Tetrasodium EDTA
    • Trideceth-10
    • Histidine
    • Acetic Acid
    • Propylene Glycol
    • Triethylene Glycol

    No data in our sources (1)

    • Citric Add

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.