ORAL B
Pro-expert gevoeligheid tandpasta
VerzorgingGTIN 8700216667562
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 83-point gap between the two loudest voices.
17Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 12 cleaner alternatives
Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
Split · 83 pts apart- 17
- 55
- 100
- 80
- 90
- 70
Lowest 17 · highest 100 · gap 83
Also screened — no listing found
Recognized on a safer-ingredients list
Environmental
Also screened — no listing found
Labor
- 30
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
no black box
How this score is built
no black box
How this score is built
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
- 1
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
- 2
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
- 3
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
- 4
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
- Greenlens Ingredient Scan17 on 0–10017
- Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist55 on 0–10055
- Greenlens Precautionary Screen100 on 0–100100
- ANSES Endocrine Disruptors80 on 0–10080
- EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)90 on 0–10090
- Greenlens Tolerance Screen70 on 0–10070
Average of 17 · 55 · 100 · 80 · 90 · 70pillar43
Raters split here, so this 43 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Why the safety score
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
17/100
Flagged 10 of 24 ingredients: 5 restricted, 2 of concern, 3 regulated allergens.
- Sodium Lauryl SulfateCommon transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
- Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
- ZINC ACETATE / ZINC CHLORIDE / ZINC GLUCONATE / ZINC GLUTAMATEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
- Stannous FluorideEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
- POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
- Sodium fluorideEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
- ACID BLUE 9EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
- MentholEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
- LimoneneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
- AnetholeEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
Starts at 100; 14 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 83 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Flagged ingredients
- Sodium Lauryl Sulfate3 positions →
- Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)3 positions →
- ZINC ACETATE / ZINC CHLORIDE / ZINC GLUCONATE / ZINC GLUTAMATE3 positions →
- Stannous Fluoride4 positions →
- POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDE3 positions →
- Sodium fluoride4 positions →
- Citric Acid4 positions →
- ACID BLUE 93 positions →
- Menthol3 positions →
- Limonene5 positions →
- Anethole3 positions →
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust24 of 24 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 24 listed ingredients.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aquasolvent | solvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Sorbitolperfumingfragrancehumectant | perfumingfragrancehumectant | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Hydrated Silicaabrasiveabsorbentanticaking | abrasiveabsorbentanticaking | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Sodium Lauryl Sulfatecleansingdenaturantfoaming | cleansingdenaturantfoaming | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Sodium Gluconatechelatingskin conditioning | chelatingskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Carrageenan | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized | |
| Aromaflavouring | flavouring | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Sodium Citratefragrancechelatingbuffering | fragrancechelatingbuffering | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Xanthan Gumbindingemulsion stabilisinggel forming | bindingemulsion stabilisinggel forming | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Zinc Citrateantiplaqueoral care | antiplaqueoral care | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Stannous Fluorideantiplaqueoral care | antiplaqueoral care | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Sodium Hydroxidebufferingdenaturant | bufferingdenaturant | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Stannous Chloridereducing | reducing | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Sodium Saccharinfragranceflavouringoral care | fragranceflavouringoral care | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Sodium Fluorideantiplaqueoral care | antiplaqueoral care | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Sucraloseskin conditioning | skin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Glycerinperfuminghumectantdenaturant | perfuminghumectantdenaturant | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Citric Acidfragrancechelatingbuffering | fragrancechelatingbuffering | Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| CI 42090coloranthair dyeing | coloranthair dyeing | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Sodium Benzoatepreservativefragranceanticorrosive | preservativefragranceanticorrosive | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Potassium Sorbatepreservativefragrance | preservativefragrance | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Mentholfragrancedenaturantrefreshing | fragrancedenaturantrefreshing | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Limoneneperfumingdeodorantsolvent | perfumingdeodorantsolvent | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Anetholefragrancedenaturant | fragrancedenaturant | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |