Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/badedas/Feel Bubbly met Passievrucht & Jasmijn Douchegel
Feel Bubbly met Passievrucht & Jasmijn Douchegel
badedas

Feel Bubbly met Passievrucht & Jasmijn Douchegel

shower gels250mlGTIN 8710908188015

Cleaner pick · Safest wash & scrub we have rated

Africology Skincare & Spa

Bio Therapy Body Wash

+78 on ingredient safety

250ml · 60 ZAR · 24 ZAR/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 9813 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

51OUT OF 100Poor

range 44–72

22▲▼ split
Safety
86
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

42-point split

0

Scan

42

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

9813 found

See better →

Flagged

12 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 9813 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

85 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 52% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·21 of 23 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 21 of 23 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (12)

  • Styrene10/10solventraters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

  • Limonene7/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

  • Cocamidopropyl Betaine6/10common irritantantistatic · cleansing · hair conditioningraters disagree

    Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Parfum6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Linalool6/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorantraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Jasminum Officinale Flower Extract4/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Sodium Lauryl Sulfate4/10common irritantcleansing · denaturant · foamingraters disagree

    Transparency concern · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Acrylates Copolymer4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

    Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Sodium Hydroxide4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • CI 191404/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (9)

  • Aqua
  • Sodium Laureth Sulfate
  • Sodium Chloride
  • Passiflora Edulis Fruit Extract
  • Sodium Lactate
  • Sorbitol
  • Tetrasodium EDTA
  • Sodium Benzoate
  • CI 15985

No data in our sources (2)

  • Propylen Glycol
  • Jasmin

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (3)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • common irritantCocamidopropyl Betaine, Sodium Lauryl Sulfate

    • Cocamidopropyl Betaine: A mild cleansing agent, but a recurring patch-test finding, usually traced to leftovers from how it is made. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2004 (Fowler JF Jr, Dermatitis 2004;15(1):3-4).
    • Sodium Lauryl Sulfate: A strong cleansing agent used as the reference irritant in skin-irritation testing. OECD Test Guideline 439 (in vitro skin irritation, reconstructed human epidermis), paragraph 24: "The suggested PC is 5% aqueous SDS", sodium dodecyl sulphate, the same substance as sodium lauryl sulfate, CAS 151-21-3.
  • fragrance materialLimonene, Linalool

    • Limonene: A citrus-smelling fragrance component named separately on the label; the one name covers three related isomers. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 88: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. That entry carries transition footnote (37): stock that does not comply, lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off, may still be made available until 31 July 2028. It is marked on the racemic dl-limonene/Dipentene line and the (S)-(l-limonene) line, but NOT the (R)-p-mentha-1,8-diene (d-limonene) line, CAS 5989-27-5, whose duty was already running as entry 88 before Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545 and so needed no transition. All three isomers are declared under the single glossary name "Limonene", so that name on a label does not identify which of them is present.
    • Linalool: A floral fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 84: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
  • undeclared fragrance blendParfum

    • Parfum: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.