Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Sanex/Men Stress Response 48H
Men Stress Response 48H
Sanex · owned by Colgate

Men Stress Response 48H

Produits marketés pour les hommes50mlGTIN 8714789828558
V

Cleaner pick · Safest produits marketés pour les hommes we have rated

Vichy

Ultra Fresh Deodorant Spray

+21 on ingredient safety, gives up 28 on packaging

100ml

Ingredient safetySplit · 42→94
Find on Amazon ↗See all 2 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

36OUT OF 100Horrible

range 30–52

33▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

27-point split

15

Scan

42

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2 found

See better →

Flagged

4 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 65-point gap between the two loudest voices.

15Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
80ECHA SVHC Candidate ListGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 2 cleaner options, safest first → Never ordered by affiliate payout.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

65 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Sanex as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·12 of 13 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 12 of 13 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (4)

    • Cyclomethicone10/10emollient · hair conditioning · solventraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • Parfum6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Aluminum Zirconium Tetrachlorohydrex GLY4/10antiperspirant · astringent · deodorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (8)

    • Elaeis Guineensis Kernel Oil
    • Stearyl Alcohol
    • C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate
    • PPG-14 Butyl Ether
    • Hydrogenated Castor Oil
    • Hydrogenated Soybean Oil
    • PEG-8 Distearate
    • Behenyl Alcohol

    No data in our sources (1)

    • Pentaerithrityl Tetra-dit-butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • undeclared fragrance blendParfum

      • Parfum: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.