Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Bio+/Gel Douche Bio Abricot Pointe de Basilic
B
Bio+

Gel Douche Bio Abricot Pointe de Basilic

Shower GelGTIN 8720181141690

Your composite

60OUT OF 100Fair

range 52–71

70▲▼ split
Safety
70
Eco
52▲▼ split
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

34-point split

75

Scan

60

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12 found

See better →

Flagged

6 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Labor

A 44-point gap between the two loudest voices.

30Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofit
vs
74Open Beauty Facts CertificationsNonprofit
050100

Cleaner options

See 12 cleaner alternatives

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 34 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    75
  • Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernmentunverified match
    85
  • IARC MonographsGovernmentunverified match
    82
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    60
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    80
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Governmentunverified match
    90
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    94

Lowest 60 · highest 94 · gap 34

Also screened — no listing found

  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • California Proposition 65

Recognized on a safer-ingredients list

  • US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) — 87% of ingredients recognized

Environmental

  • Open Beauty Facts Organic & NaturalNonprofitunverified match
    70

Also screened — no listing found

  • EU Microplastics Restriction

Labor

Split · 44 pts apart
  • Open Beauty Facts CertificationsNonprofitunverified match
    74
  • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
    30

Lowest 30 · highest 74 · gap 44

Packaging

  • Greenlens Packaging ScanIndependentunverified match
    46

Coverage & match quality

11 ratings · 4 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan75 on 0–100→75
  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist85 on 0–100→85
  • IARC Monographs82 on 0–100→82
  • Greenlens Precautionary Screen60 on 0–100→60
  • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors80 on 0–100→80
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)90 on 0–100→90
  • Greenlens Tolerance Screen94 on 0–100→94
Average of 75 · 85 · 82 · 60 · 80 · 90 · 94pillar70

Raters split here, so this 70 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

75/100

Flagged 3 of 15 ingredients: 1 restricted, 1 of concern, 1 regulated allergen.

  • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
  • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
  • LimoneneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3

Starts at 100; 12 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 34 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Flagged ingredients

  • Cocamidopropyl Betaine3 positions →
  • Citric Acid4 positions →
  • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)3 positions →
  • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDE3 positions →
  • Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice Powder4 positions →
  • Limonene5 positions →

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·15 of 15 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 15 listed ingredients.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
Aqua→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Sodium Coco-Sulfate→cleansingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingcleansingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Decyl Glucoside→cleansingemulsion stabilisingsurfactant - cleansingcleansingemulsion stabilisingsurfactant - cleansingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Cocamidopropyl Betaine→antistaticcleansinghair conditioningantistaticcleansinghair conditioning6/10Strong contact sensitizer· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Sodium Chloride→fragranceoral carebulkingfragranceoral carebulkingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Citric Acid→fragrancechelatingbufferingfragrancechelatingbuffering4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Sodium Benzoate→preservativefragranceanticorrosivepreservativefragranceanticorrosiveNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Glyceryl Oleate→perfumingemollientsurfactant - emulsifyingperfumingemollientsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Coco-Glucoside→cleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansingcleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Parfum→perfumingfragranceperfumingfragrance4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Sodium Sulfate→bulkingviscosity controllingbulkingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Sodium Hydroxide→bufferingdenaturantbufferingdenaturant4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice Powder→skin conditioningskin conditioning4/10IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Limonene→perfumingdeodorantsolventperfumingdeodorantsolvent7/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced