Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/esfolio/moisture milk hand cream
moisture milk hand cream
esfolio

moisture milk hand cream

hand100mlGTIN 8809386880266
Birch Moisturizing Hand Cream

Cleaner pick · Safest hands & feet we have rated

Round Lab

Birch Moisturizing Hand Cream

+72 on ingredient safety

$8.50

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 2554 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

55OUT OF 100Poor

range 47–75

28▲▼ split
Safety
90
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

42-point split

40

Scan

40

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2554 found

See better →

Flagged

8 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.

5ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 2554 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

85 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 56% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic paper”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic paper” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·35 of 36 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 35 of 36 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (8)

  • Triethanolamine8/10fragrance · buffering · surfactant - cleansingraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

  • Methylparaben7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

  • Propylparaben7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

  • Fragrance6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Linalool6/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorantraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Coumarin6/10fragrance materialperfumingraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Carbomer4/10emulsion stabilising · gel forming · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Polyacrylate-134/10film formingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (27)

  • Water
  • Glycerinhumectant
  • Mineral Oilrich occlusive
  • Cetyl Alcohol
  • Hippophae Rhamnoides Extract
  • Chaenomeles Sinensis Fruit Extract
  • Polysorbate 60
  • Stearyl Alcohol
  • Palmitic Acid
  • Sorbitan Stearate
  • Stearic Acid
  • Glyceryl Stearate
  • PEG-100 Stearate
  • Dimethiconerich occlusive
  • Myristyl Alcohol
  • Polyisobutene
  • Lauryl Alcohol
  • Disodium EDTA
  • Butylene Glycol
  • Polysorbate 20
  • Sorbitan Isostearate
  • Myristic Acid
  • Arachidic Acid
  • 1,2-Hexanediol
  • Lauric Acid
  • Oleic Acid
  • Ethylhexylglycerin

No data in our sources (1)

  • Milk Protein Extract

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (4)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • fragrance materialLinalool, Coumarin

    • Linalool: A floral fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 84: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
    • Coumarin: A sweet hay-scented fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 77: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
  • undeclared fragrance blendFragrance

    • Fragrance: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
  • rich occlusiveMineral Oil, Dimethicone

    • Mineral Oil: A refined oil that sits on the surface of the skin; it has a heavy finish. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(l): "Mineral oil, 50 to 100 percent; 30 to 35 percent in combination with colloidal oatmeal in accordance with 347.20(a)(4)."
    • Dimethicone: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.
  • humectantGlycerin

    • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".