Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/ponds/Hydra Miracle
Hydra Miracle
ponds

Hydra Miracle

uncategorizedGTIN 8901030703133

Your composite

30OUT OF 100Horrible

range 18–59

29▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

33-point split

56

Scan

55

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flagged

9 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 83-point gap between the two loudest voices.

5ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 83 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    56
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    55
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    5
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Governmentunverified match
    60
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    88

Lowest 5 · highest 88 · gap 83

Also screened — no listing found

  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
  • IARC Monographs
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • California Proposition 65

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
      30

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan56 on 0–100→56
    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen55 on 0–100→55
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors5 on 0–100→5
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)60 on 0–100→60
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen88 on 0–100→88
    Average of 56 · 55 · 5 · 60 · 88pillar29

    Raters split here, so this 29 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    56/100

    Flagged 8 of 25 ingredients: 2 restricted, 1 of concern, 4 regulated allergens.

    • Trialkylamines, trialkanolamines and their saltsEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • BHT / BHACommon transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
    • GeraniolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • Hexyl CinnamalEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • LimoneneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • LinaloolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • ACID BLUE 9EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10

    Starts at 100; 18 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 33 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Flagged ingredients

    • Phenoxyethanol3 positions →
    • Trialkylamines, trialkanolamines and their salts4 positions →
    • BHT (Butylated Hydroxytoluene)4 positions →
    • IODOPROPYNYL BUTYLCARBAMATE4 positions →
    • Geraniol4 positions →
    • Hexyl Cinnamal4 positions →
    • Limonene5 positions →
    • Linalool4 positions →
    • ACID BLUE 93 positions →

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·21 of 25 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 21 of 25 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    WATER DIMETHICONE→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    GLYCERIN→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    BUTYLENE GLYCOL→fragrancehumectantskin conditioningfragrancehumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    AMMONIUM ACRYLOYLDIMETHYLTAURATE VP COPOLYMER→viscosity controllingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    NIACINAMIDE→smoothingsmoothingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    LINOLEAMIDOPROPYL PG-DIMONIUM CHLORIDE PHOSPHATE→antistaticantistaticNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    PHENOXYETHANOL→preservativeantimicrobialpreservativeantimicrobial4/10Mild sensitizer for some· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    AMMONIUM ACRYLOYLDIMETHYLTAURATE/BEHENETH-25 METHACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER→emulsion stabilisingemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    DIMETHICONE→emollientantifoamingskin conditioningemollientantifoamingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    PERFUME→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    SODIUM PCA→humectantantistatichair conditioninghumectantantistatichair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    DISODIUM EDTA→chelatingviscosity controllingchelatingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    STEARIC ACID→fragrancecleansingemulsion stabilisingfragrancecleansingemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE→perfumingfragranceskin conditioningperfumingfragranceskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    TOCOPHERYL ACETATE→antioxidantskin conditioningantioxidantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    TRIETHANOLAMINE→fragrancebufferingsurfactant - cleansingfragrancebufferingsurfactant - cleansing8/10ANSES CMR-listed· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    BHT→fragranceantioxidantfragranceantioxidant7/10Endocrine-active· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    IODOPROPYNYL BUTYLCARBAMATE→preservativepreservative6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    SODIUM HYALURONATE CROSSPOLYMER SODIUM HYALURONATE SODIUM ACETYLATED HYALURONATE HYDROLYZED HYALURONIC ACID PENTYLENE GLYCOL ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN AQUA→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    CITRAL CITRONELLOL→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    GERANIOL→perfumingtonicperfumingtonic6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    HEXYL CINNAMAL→perfumingperfuming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    LIMONENE→perfumingdeodorantsolventperfumingdeodorantsolvent7/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    LINALOOL→perfumingdeodorantperfumingdeodorant6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    CI 42090→coloranthair dyeingcoloranthair dyeing4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced