Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 80-point gap between the two loudest voices.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
11 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
What we know about the packaging
Unidentified0 of 1 identified
Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
Data availability
Robust43 of 47 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 43 of 47 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (12)
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 6 of 9 lists →
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists →
IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A)flagged by 5 of 9 lists →
EU harmonised CMR (cat. 2)flagged by 4 of 9 lists →
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (31)
No data in our sources (4)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.