Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Unilever/Hand Wash
Unilever

Hand Wash

hand washGTIN 8934868133391
Birch Moisturizing Hand Cream

Cleaner pick · Safest hands & feet we have rated

Round Lab

Birch Moisturizing Hand Cream

+25 on ingredient safety

$8.50

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 631 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

59OUT OF 100Fair

range 57–66

75▲▼ split
Safety
86
Eco
30
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

13-point split

87

Scan

100

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

631 found

See better →

Flagged

6 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 35-point gap between the two loudest voices.

65EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 631 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

35 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · IARC Monographs · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 50% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Unilever as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 4 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·29 of 34 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 29 of 34 listed ingredients; 5 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (6)

  • Pentasodium Pentetate8/10chelatingraters disagree

    EU harmonised CMR (cat. 1) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Thymol6/10fragrance · hair dyeing · denaturantraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

    Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Acrylates Copolymer4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Sodium Hydroxide4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Terpineol4/10fragrance materialperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (23)

  • Sodium Laureth Sulfate
  • sodium chloride
  • Glycol Distearate
  • Cocamide MEA
  • Perfume
  • Sodium Benzoate
  • PPG-9
  • Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil
  • Tetrasodium EDTA
  • Glycerinhumectant
  • PEG-40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil
  • Silver Oxide
  • Prunus Persica juice
  • Lauric Acid
  • Potassium Sorbate
  • Dried Cream
  • Lavandula Angustifolia oilfragrance material
  • Prunus Amygdalus Dulcis oil
  • Xanthan Gum
  • water
  • sunflower
  • lavender
  • Sweet Almond

No data in our sources (5)

  • Thành phẩn
  • VP
  • VA Copolymer
  • Lactic Acid Hướng dất hàn tay Tao bot với
  • peach

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (2)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • fragrance materialLavandula Angustifolia oil

    • Lavandula Angustifolia oil: An essential oil the EU names on its own account as a fragrance substance to be declared on the label, under a shared name covering several lavender species. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 360, inserted by Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products. It is declarable in its OWN right, not by way of any component it carries. The entry is a GROUPED one covering the oils and extracts of Lavandula angustifolia, Lavandula intermedia and Lavandula hybrida, about eight glossary names in all, all declared under the single common name "Lavandula Oil/ Extract", so that name on a label does not identify which of them is present. The duty applies now. Transition footnote (40) lets stock that does not comply, lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off, be made available until 31 July 2028.
  • humectantGlycerin

    • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

Where this came from

Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against azmart.vn ↗

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.