Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Vademecum/Toothpaste
V
Vademecum · owned by Henkel

Toothpaste

ToothpasteGTIN 90443633
R

Cleaner pick · Safest toothpaste we have rated

RiseWell

Mineral Toothpaste Flavorless

+52 on ingredient safety

$12

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 509 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

39OUT OF 100Horrible

range 32–60

48▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

43-point split

33

Scan

42

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

509 found

See better →

Flagged

7 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 57-point gap between the two loudest voices.

33Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 509 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

57 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Vademecum as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Fair·20 of 31 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 20 of 31 listed ingredients; 11 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (8)

    • ci 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • limonene7/10perfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • flavouring6/10raters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • cocamidopropyl betaine6/10antistatic · cleansing · hair conditioningraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • sodium lauryl sulfate4/10cleansing · denaturant · foamingraters disagree

      Transparency concern · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • sodium fluoride4/10antiplaque · oral careraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • calcium peroxide4/10oxidisingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • calcium hydroxide4/10bufferingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (12)

    • eau
    • hydrated silica
    • sorbitol
    • propylene glycol
    • peg 32
    • cellulose gum
    • trisodium phosphate
    • sodium saccharin
    • disodium phosphate
    • sodium chloride
    • calcium carbonate
    • sodium sulfate

    No data in our sources (11)

    • sastojci
    • cbctab
    • ingrediente
    • permbajtja
    • coctojkm
    • kok uporabe označen na ambalaži
    • rok upotrebe
    • i satypur ne paketim
    • pok ha ynorpeba
    • schwarzkopf
    • henkel 12 m dusseldort germany 100ml e pp

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.