Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Unilever/Gluta-Hya Body Lotion Pro-Age Restore
Unilever

Gluta-Hya Body Lotion Pro-Age Restore

Body LotionGTIN 9300830092130

Your composite

59OUT OF 100Fair

range 55–71

57▲▼ split
Safety
90
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

39-point split

66

Scan

55

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12 found

See better →

Flagged

5 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 49-point gap between the two loudest voices.

45ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 12 cleaner alternatives

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 49 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    66
  • IARC MonographsGovernmentunverified match
    82
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    55
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    45
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    94

Lowest 45 · highest 94 · gap 49

Also screened — no listing found

  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
  • California Proposition 65

Environmental

  • EU Microplastics RestrictionGovernmentunverified match
    90

Labor

  • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
    30

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan66 on 0–100→66
  • IARC Monographs82 on 0–100→82
  • Greenlens Precautionary Screen55 on 0–100→55
  • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors45 on 0–100→45
  • Greenlens Tolerance Screen94 on 0–100→94
Average of 66 · 82 · 55 · 45 · 94pillar57

Raters split here, so this 57 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

66/100

Flagged 5 of 21 ingredients: 1 restricted, 2 of concern.

  • MethylparabenCommon transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
  • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
  • TITANIUM DIOXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10

Starts at 100; 18 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 39 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Flagged ingredients

  • Carbomer4 positions →
  • Phenoxyethanol3 positions →
  • Methylparaben4 positions →
  • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)3 positions →
  • Titanium Dioxide5 positions →

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·19 of 21 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 19 of 21 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
Water→antiplaqueskin conditioningsolventantiplaqueskin conditioningsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Dimethicone→emollientantifoamingskin conditioningemollientantifoamingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Isohexadecane→emollientsolventemollientsolventNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Niacinamide→smoothingsmoothingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Glutathione→reducingreducingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Sodium Hyaluronate→humectantskin conditioninghumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Collagen→hair conditioningmoisturisingskin conditioninghair conditioningmoisturisingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Glycine→antistaticbufferinghair conditioningantistaticbufferinghair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Cystine→fragranceantistatichair conditioningfragranceantistatichair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Sodium PCA→humectantantistatichair conditioninghumectantantistatichair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Tocopherol→fragranceantioxidantskin conditioningfragranceantioxidantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Petrolatum→emollientantistaticemollientantistaticExamined, no flagReferenced
Carbomer→emulsion stabilisinggel formingviscosity controllingemulsion stabilisinggel formingviscosity controlling4/10EU microplastics-restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Acrylates→—Not in our sourcesNo data
C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer→—Not in our sourcesNo data
Disodium EDTA→chelatingviscosity controllingchelatingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Phenoxyethanol→preservativeantimicrobialpreservativeantimicrobial4/10Mild sensitizer for some· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Methylparaben→preservativefragrancepreservativefragrance7/10Endocrine-active· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Fragrance→—4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Titanium Dioxide→uv filteruv absorbercolorantuv filteruv absorbercolorant8/10ANSES CMR-listed· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagreeReferenced

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.