Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Sven's Island/Manuka Kiss Gentle Barrier Body Wash
Manuka Kiss Gentle Barrier Body Wash
Sven's Island

Manuka Kiss Gentle Barrier Body Wash

Body Wash400mlGTIN 9421908519059

Cleaner pick · Safest wash & scrub we have rated

Africology Skincare & Spa

Bio Therapy Body Wash

+6 on ingredient safety

250ml · 60 ZAR · 24 ZAR/100 ml

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 797 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

70OUT OF 100Good

range 68–72

94
Safety
70
Eco
85
Labor
32
Pkg

Why this score

3-point split

97

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

797 found

See better →

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

All 797 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors

Environmental

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Sven's Island as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 4 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Partly identified·1 of 2 identified

1 of 2 packaging components is a named material; Plastic (unspecified) is recorded only in general terms, so that part of the score is a stand-in.

  • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

How we know the packaging

Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good·16 of 22 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 16 of 22 listed ingredients; 6 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (2)

  • Benzyl Alcohol6/10preservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

    Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (14)

  • Aqua
  • Lauryl Glucoside
  • Glycerin
  • Cetearyl Alcohol
  • Cetearyl Wheat Straw Glycosides
  • Sodium Stearoyl Glutamate
  • Xanthan Gum
  • Chamomilla recutita
  • Cocos nucifera
  • Helianthus annuus
  • Butyrospermum parkii
  • Dehydroacetic Acid
  • Tocopheryl Acetate
  • Rosmarinus officinalis

No data in our sources (6)

  • Prunus amygdalus dulcis
  • Leptospermum scoparium
  • Kunzea ericoides
  • Cymbopogon martini
  • Althaea officinalis
  • Certified organic ingredients

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.