Whole Plant Effect Foam Cleanser safety rating

Whole Plant Effect Foam Cleanser safety rating | Greenlens

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 30-point gap between the two loudest voices.

65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment

vs

95Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent

050100

See why, ingredient by ingredient

All 2079 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

30 pts apart

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 8, 2026. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 8, 2026. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 8, 2026. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 8, 2026. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 8, 2026. about this rater →

Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 77% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026.

Environmental

A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 8, 2026. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmental1.0×

Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust13 of 13 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 13 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (2)

Titanium Dioxideuv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Acrylates Copolymer

No flags in our sources (11)

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

humectantGlycerin
- Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".