Shine Muscat Cica BHA Food Mask safety rating

Shine Muscat Cica BHA Food Mask safety rating | Greenlens

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 8, 2026. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 8, 2026. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 8, 2026. about this rater →

Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · IARC Monographs

Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 67% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026. We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026.

Environmental

Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

We started showing this clearance on Sep 8, 2026.

Labor

Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Skin Food as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 8, 2026. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Labor1.0×

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust14 of 15 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 14 of 15 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

No flags in our sources (14)

No data in our sources (1)

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

humectantGlycerin
- Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from consciousbunny.com ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.