Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Physicians Formula/Natural Defense Sheer Line of Defense Foundation, 1711343 Medium, SPF 30 (2020 formulation)
Natural Defense Sheer Line of Defense Foundation, 1711343 Medium, SPF 30 (2020 formulation)
Physicians Formula

Natural Defense Sheer Line of Defense Foundation, 1711343 Medium, SPF 30 (2020 formulation)

uncategorized

Your composite

64OUT OF 100Fair

range 54–85

28▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

74-point split

56

Scan

14

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No fair cohort on file, so no comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 88-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

88 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

raters agree
  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

10 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·39 of 42 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 39 of 42 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (9)

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE 5.88/10raters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • OCTINOXATE 7.47/10raters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • BHT7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • FRAGRANCE/PARFUM6/10perfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • CYCLOPENTASILOXANE4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

    Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • METHYL METHACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

    Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (30)

  • ZINC OXIDE 1.0
  • WATER/EAU
  • DIMETHICONE
  • BUTYLENE GLYCOL
  • PROPANEDIOL
  • GLYCERIN
  • POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE
  • DIETHYLHEXYL SUCCINATE
  • SILICA
  • BRASSICA CAMPESTRIS/ALEURITES FORDI OIL COPOLYMER
  • LAURYL PEG-9 POLYDIMETHYLSILOXYETHYL DIMETHICONE
  • PEG-10 DIMETHICONE
  • CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE
  • ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE
  • SODIUM CHLORIDE
  • STEARIC ACID
  • DIMETHICONE/PEG-10/15 CROSSPOLYMER
  • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
  • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
  • HEXYLENE GLYCOL
  • HYDROGEN DIMETHICONE
  • EDTA
  • TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE
  • PEG/PPG-18/ 18 DIMETHICONE
  • DIPROPYLENE GLYCOL
  • SODIUM CITRATE
  • TOCOPHEROL
  • LECITHIN
  • PLANKTON EXTRACT
  • MICA

No data in our sources (3)

  • DIMETHICONENINYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
  • MAY CONTAIN/PEUT CONTENIR: IRON OXIDES
  • 1907-1

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.