Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Better Natured/Zotos Professional Permanent Liqui Creme Color, Dark Ash Blonde 6 A
Zotos Professional Permanent Liqui Creme Color, Dark Ash Blonde 6 A
Better Natured

Zotos Professional Permanent Liqui Creme Color, Dark Ash Blonde 6 A

Hair Color And Bleaching
NB

Cleaner pick · Safest color we have rated

Naturally Brite

Henna Hair Dye, Dark Brown

+62 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1059 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

38OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 22–70

38▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

42-point split

22

Scan

42

Precautionary

64

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1059 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 48-point gap between the two loudest voices.

22Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
70Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 1059 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

48 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·29 of 31 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 29 of 31 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (10)

    • RESORCINOL7/10perfuming · hair dyeing · antioxidantraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE7/10common irritanthair dyeing

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 6 of 9 lists

    • PARFUM6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CITRONELLOL6/10fragrance materialperfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • LINALOOL6/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • POLYQUATERNIUM-534/10hair conditioningraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • SODIUM SULFITE4/10preservative · antioxidant · hair waving or straighteningraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • 2,4-DIAMINOPHENOXYETHANOL HCL4/10hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (19)

    • AQUA
    • CETEARYL ALCOHOL
    • STEARYL ALCOHOL
    • POLYSORBATE 20
    • OLEYL ALCOHOL
    • SODIUM COCO-SULFATE
    • SORBITOL
    • PROPANEDIOL
    • GLYCERYL STEARATE
    • ERYTHORBIC ACID
    • COCOS NUCIFERA OIL
    • ACRYLATES/C10-30 ALKYL ACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER
    • SODIUM GLUCONATE
    • SODIUM METASILICATE
    • ARGININE
    • ELAEIS GUINEENSIS EXTRACT
    • PHALAENOPSIS AMABILIS EXTRACT
    • COCOS NUCIFERA FRUIT EXTRACT
    • PHOSPHORIC ACID

    No data in our sources (2)

    • N
    • N-BIS -P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE SULFATE

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (3)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantP-PHENYLENEDIAMINE

      • P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE: A hair-dye coupler and one of the most frequently positive substances in patch-test clinics. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 8a permits p-phenylenediamine and its salts as a hair dye substance in oxidative hair dye products, at a maximum of 2% free base applied to hair after mixing; entry 8b separately permits them in products intended for colouring eyelashes, professional use only, at the same 2% limit, so this is not a hair-dye-only restriction. The general-use wording entry 8a mandates begins with the mixing ratio, then "Hair colourants can cause severe allergic reactions", "Read and follow instructions", "This product is not intended for use on persons under the age of 16", "Temporary “black henna” tattoos may increase your risk of allergy", a three-part "Do not colour your hair if" contraindication list, "Contains phenylenediamines" and "Do not use to dye eyelashes or eyebrows". The professional-use wording PREPENDS "For professional use only." and ends "Wear suitable gloves." where the general one ends with the eyelash sentence.
    • fragrance materialCITRONELLOL, LINALOOL

      • CITRONELLOL: A rose-and-citrus fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 86: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
      • LINALOOL: A floral fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 84: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
    • undeclared fragrance blendPARFUM

      • PARFUM: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.