Physicians Formula
Diamond Filler Cheek & Lip Color Radiant Pink
Blush
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 71-point gap between the two loudest voices.
22IARC MonographsGovernment
vs93Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 2621 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
71 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust31 of 32 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 31 of 32 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (5)
NTP known carcinogenflagged by 2 of 9 lists
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (26)
- HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
- HYDROGENATED POLYDECENE
- MICA
- TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
- ISODODECANE
- OCTYLDODECANOL
- QUATERNIUM-90 BENTONITE
- SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
- ETHYLENE/PROPYLENE/STYRENE COPOLYMER
- PROPYLENE CARBONATE
- SORBITAN SESQUIOLEATE
- PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE
- BUTYLENE/ETHYLENE/STYRENE COPOLYMER
- ETHYL VANILLIN
- HYDROLYZED HYALURONIC ACID
- ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
- TRIBEHENIN
- DIAMOND POWDER
- SORBITAN ISOSTEARATE
- PALMITOYL TRIPEPTIDE-1
- TIN OXIDE
- MAY CONTAIN: IRON OXIDES
- RED 7 LAKE
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.