Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 80-point gap between the two loudest voices.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Grisi as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
10 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust41 of 44 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 41 of 44 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (20)
EU-prohibitedflagged by 6 of 9 lists →
EU-prohibitedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
Reproductive-toxicant concernflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Strong contact sensitizerflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Strong contact sensitizerflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (21)
No data in our sources (3)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
comedogenic in testingISOPROPYL PALMITATE
common irritantLANOLIN ALCOHOL, PROPYLENE GLYCOL, METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE
fragrance materialLINALOOL, LIMONENE, BENZYL SALICYLATE, CITRONELLOL, GERANIOL, BUTYLPHENYL METHYLPROPIONAL, COUMARIN, CITRAL
undeclared fragrance blendPARFUM/ FRAGRANCE
rich occlusiveLANOLIN ALCOHOL, DIMETHICONE
humectantGLYCERIN
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.