Ingredient profile
At least one of our safety lists speaks to this ingredient. Also written as Acrylamide, ACRYLAMIDE.
Raters don't agree. Here's where each one stands
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
US NTP Report on Carcinogens
Government
Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Government
IARC Monographs
Government
EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Government
Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Government
Free acrylamide monomer is prohibited in cosmetics (residual limits govern its polymers elsewhere). (Health Canada Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist)
US NTP Report on Carcinogens
Government
Acrylamide, a residual monomer in some polyacrylamide thickeners/film-formers, is reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen. (US NTP Report on Carcinogens (15th ed.))
Also screened — not on these lists
Each jurisdiction is reported on its own terms, from its own official lists. Where they disagree, that disagreement is the finding. Absence from a list is never a safety claim.
Prohibited as a cosmetic ingredient in this jurisdiction.
Prohibited as a cosmetic ingredient in this jurisdiction.
IARC Monographs
Government
Acrylamide, a residual monomer in some polyacrylamide thickeners/film-formers, is classified probably carcinogenic to humans. (IARC Monographs, Vol. 60)
EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Government
Carries an EU harmonised classification (Carc. 1B, Muta. 1B, Repr. 2, Skin Sens. 1) — a definite (category 1A/1B) carcinogen, mutagen or reproductive toxicant under CLP Annex VI, index 616-003-00-0. A hazard classification, not proof of harm at the level used. (EU CLP Regulation Annex VI, Table 3 (harmonised classification, ECHA export))
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
No EU-regulated hazard recognized for this ingredient.
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
No listed hazard trait recognized for this ingredient.
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
No prohibited or high-risk classification for this ingredient.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: OEHHA Proposition 65 list.
Appears on an official list. A listing, not a use ban.