Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Murad Skincare/Prebiotic 4-in-1 MultiCleanser
Prebiotic 4-in-1 MultiCleanser
Murad Skincare

Prebiotic 4-in-1 MultiCleanser

Cleansertypically $30–70GTIN 0767332108902
Micellar Solution, 4 in 1 Makeup Remover, Cleanser, Hydrating Toner

Cleaner pick · Safest multi-function cleansers & exfoliants we have rated

isdin

Micellar Solution, 4 in 1 Makeup Remover, Cleanser, Hydrating Toner

+67 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 111 cleaner options →2 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

50OUT OF 100Poor

range 44–72

33▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
85
Labor
32
Pkg

Why this score

85-point split

15

Scan

100

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

111 found

See better →

Flagged

3 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.

15Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 111 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

85 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Murad Skincare as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Partly identified·1 of 2 identified

    1 of 2 packaging components is a named material; Plastic (unspecified) is recorded only in general terms, so that part of the score is a stand-in.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

    The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·31 of 32 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 31 of 32 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • Acrylamide10/10raters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 6 of 9 lists →

    • Hydroxyethyl Acrylate6/10film formingraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (29)

    • Water
    • Aqua
    • Glycerinhumectant
    • Decyl Glucoside
    • Hexylene Glycol
    • Propanediol
    • Sodium Acryloyldimethyl Taurate Copolymer
    • Lactobacillus
    • Alpha-Glucan Oligosaccharide
    • Polymnia Sonchifolia Root Juice
    • Xylitol
    • Xylitylglucoside
    • Anhydroxylitol
    • Sodium Hyaluronatehumectant
    • Sodium Surfactin
    • Squalane
    • Ureahumectant
    • Yeast Amino Acids
    • Trehalose
    • Inositol
    • Taurine
    • Betaine
    • Isohexadecane
    • Caprylhydroxamic Acid
    • Maltodextrin
    • 1‚2 Hexanediol
    • Polysorbate 80
    • Sodium Acryloyldimethyltaurate Copolymer
    • Disodium EDTA

    No data in our sources (1)

    • C13-C16 Isoparaffin

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • humectantGlycerin, Sodium Hyaluronate, Urea

      • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".
      • Sodium Hyaluronate: A humectant that holds a large amount of water at the skin surface. Chylińska N, Maciejczyk M, "Hyaluronic Acid and Skin: Its Role in Aging and Wound-Healing Processes", Gels 2025;11(4):281, DOI 10.3390/gels11040281, PMID 40277717, open access: hyaluronic acid's "high osmotic activity and anionic structure enable it to bind large amounts of water", and "sodium and potassium hyaluronate are widely used in moisturizing products". The same review notes that high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid does not penetrate the deeper layers.
      • Urea: A humectant the skin already makes; at higher levels it also softens thickened skin. StatPearls, "Moisturizers", NCBI Bookshelf NBK545171, updated 12 February 2024: "Urea is a component of NMF. The addition of urea to moisturizers helps with the absorption of water into the stratum corneum." The FDA label for prescription-strength urea calls it keratolytic and states that its mechanism of action is not yet known.

    Where this came from

    Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against jomashop.com ↗

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.