Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Garnier/Vitamin(e) C
Vitamin(e) C
Garnier · owned by L'Oréal

Vitamin(e) C

Skin care15mltypically under $12GTIN 3600542534260

Your composite

40OUT OF 100Poor

range 34–63

19▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
55
Labor
46
Pkg

Why this score

73-point split

15

Scan

88

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No fair cohort on file, so no comparison.

Flagged

9 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 88-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
88Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

88 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Garnier as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    10 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

    Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

    A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·43 of 47 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 43 of 47 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (9)

    • ACRYLAMIDE10/10raters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 6 of 9 lists →

    • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • TRIETHANOLAMINE8/10fragrance · buffering · surfactant - cleansingraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • CAFFEINE6/10perfuming · skin conditioningraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • SORBITAN OLEATE6/10surfactant - emulsifyingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • LACTIC ACID4/10humectant · buffering · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (34)

    • Aqua
    • WATER
    • GLYCERIN
    • DIMETHICONE
    • PRUNUS ARMENIACA KERNEL OIL
    • APRICOT KERNEL OIL
    • NIACINAMIDE
    • SODIUM ACRYLOYLDIMETHYLTAURATE COPOLYMER
    • SILICA
    • ISOHEXADECANE
    • VINYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
    • HYDROXYPROPYL TETRAHYDROPYRANTRIOL
    • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
    • PROPYLENE GLYCOL
    • C10-30 ALKYL ACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER
    • TOCOPHEROL
    • CHLORPHENESIN
    • POLYSORBATE 80
    • ASCORBYL GLUCOSIDE
    • CI 77492
    • IRON OXIDES
    • TRISODIUM ETHYLENEDIAMINE DISUCCINATE
    • MUSA SAPIENTUM FRUIT EXTRACT
    • ADENOSINE
    • HYDROLYZED HYALURONIC ACID
    • HYDROXYETHYLPIPERAZINE ETHANE SULFONIC ACID
    • MICA
    • MUSA PARADISIACA FRUIT JUICE
    • ANANAS SATIVUS FRUIT EXTRACT
    • SODIUM BENZOATE
    • DISODIUM STEAROYL GLUTAMATE
    • TIN OXIDE
    • POTASSIUM SORBATE
    • ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE

    No data in our sources (4)

    • ACRYLATES
    • BANANA FRUIT EXTRACT
    • BANANA FRUIT JUICE
    • PINEAPPLE FRUIT EXTRACT

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.