Physicians Formula
Happy Booster Glow & Mood Boosting Blush, Pink (2019 formulation)
Blush
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+77 on ingredient safety, gives up 11 on labor practices
$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.
0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 17953 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
85 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Low-confidence auto-match — it may describe a different size or variant. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- At least one rating was auto-linked to this product on a low-confidence match, so it may describe a different size or variant.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust29 of 30 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 29 of 30 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (9)
EU-prohibitedflagged by 2 of 9 lists
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A)flagged by 5 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (20)
- ZEA MAYS STARCH
- DIMETHICONE
- OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE
- ZINC STEARATE
- PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRAISOSTEARATE
- ASTROCARYUM MURUMURU SEED BUTTER
- HELIANTHUS ANNUUS SEED OIL
- LECITHIN
- PHYTOSTERYL CANOLATE
- PLUKENETIA VOLUBILIS SEED OIL
- RHODIOLA ROSEA ROOT EXTRACT
- ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS LEAF EXTRACT
- THEOBROMA GRANDIFLORUM SEED BUTTER
- PALM ALCOHOL
- POTASSIUM SORBATE
- MAY CONTAIN: CARMINE
- IRON OXIDES
- MANGANESE VIOLET
- MICA
- ULTRAMARINES
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.