No fair cohort on file, so no comparison.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 75-point gap between the two loudest voices.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates La Roche-Posay as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
11 ratings · 4 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+Data availability
Robust36 of 37 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 36 of 37 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (11)
EU-prohibitedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
Where this came from
Product identity (name, brand, category) verified against world.openbeautyfacts.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.
EU-prohibitedflagged by 6 of 9 lists →
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Strong contact sensitizerflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (25)
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
commonly dryingalcohol denat
rich occlusivedimethicone
humectantpanthenol
soothingpanthenol